“I don’t think it requires us to go negative in the sense of us  running a bunch of ads that are false, or character assassinations,”  Obama said, as reported by Univision.”It will be based on  facts.”
“We may just run clips of the Republican debates  verbatim,” he added.

I love it when our president is snarky.

“I don’t think it requires us to go negative in the sense of us running a bunch of ads that are false, or character assassinations,” Obama said, as reported by Univision.”It will be based on facts.”

“We may just run clips of the Republican debates verbatim,” he added.

I love it when our president is snarky.

(via zorabet)

13,917 notes

  1. thesickestoutthere reblogged this from jamaicanbarbies
  2. tee0wns reblogged this from oh-obama
  3. lychen-laut reblogged this from allonsyblue
  4. justas-sane-as-i-am reblogged this from holymotherofrowling and added:
    “I don’t think it requires us to go negative in the sense of us running a bunch of ads that are false, or character...
  5. origami-pegasus reblogged this from lavenderlabia
  6. getloudandprouddarling reblogged this from mlelucky
  7. steakandeggsdelicious reblogged this from inthemess and added:
    “I don’t think it requires us to go negative in the sense of us running a bunch of ads that are false, or character...
  8. designeobscura reblogged this from rainwaterglass and added:
    Obama, I believe in you enough to register to vote and get called for Jury Duty against my will. You better win :D
  9. rainwaterglass reblogged this from allonsyblue
  10. ketti-harrison reblogged this from puelhathnofury
  11. upsidebarcodes reblogged this from whenthegjallarhornsounds
  12. whenthegjallarhornsounds reblogged this from warrior-knight
  13. warrior-knight reblogged this from oh-obama and added:
    Best president is snarky president.
  14. jeromestuart reblogged this from gfrees
  15. livingto reblogged this from lleuwin and added:
    ^^Funny how that would probably actually work.
  16. thebookofkells reblogged this from paulgrossmanns
  17. lleuwin reblogged this from gfrees
  18. tinyleslieknope reblogged this from sparklery
  19. classysonasty reblogged this from paulgrossmanns
  20. lizc520 reblogged this from gfrees
  21. megrants reblogged this from s0ff and added:
    “I don’t think it requires us to go negative in the sense of us running a bunch of ads that are false, or character...
  22. s0ff reblogged this from samtarly
  23. litterthug reblogged this from gfrees
  24. emdygray reblogged this from gfrees
  25. radiofireworks reblogged this from gfrees
  26. hopscotchheartbeats reblogged this from toliveistolearn
  27. bylsmas reblogged this from gfrees
  28. wes-anderswag reblogged this from paulgrossmanns