airspaniel:

gmbeowulf:

As much as I keep seeing the “Oh, JJ Abrams is so terrible! He’s murdering Star Trek! He doesn’t understand it!” pearl-clutching…did you folks actually see the reboot? It was a good movie that you didn’t have to be a Trek fan—or an expert on twenty+ years of continuity—to enjoy. That’s what you need to do to revitalize a franchise. You need to make something that appeals to new fans, not the ever-shrinking base of old fans. That’s why comic books are such a goddamn mess: They keep forgetting that you need to appeal to someone other than 50-year-old fanboys.

And temporal paradoxes aside: New Trek doesn’t make old Trek go away. The shows, movies, novels and comics all still exist. Heck, they’re still publishing new novels for the old series. If you don’t like the new stuff, it doesn’t hurt the old stuff. Enjoy what you like, ignore what you don’t.  Just like D&D 4E didn’t cause the 3.5E books to evaporate, new stories you don’t like don’t make the good old ones go away.

You’re right, that you didn’t have to be a Trek fan to enjoy the 2009 reboot.  It was highly accessible to the non-fan moviegoing public, and perfectly standalone.  But it was ALSO enjoyable to those of us who ARE Trek fans.  The characters had been slightly reimagined, but you could still see the core of who they were, and it was very true to the source.  It was respectful to the source, and the direction and actors all seemed to make choices that were born out of homage, out of love for this iconic property that not only transcended what film and television can do, but also brought the worlds of science fiction and science fact together in a world changing and unprecedented way.  This respect was evident not only in the performances we saw on screen, but also throughout the production process, even into the casting (George Takei being consulted on John Cho’s casting, for example).

But Star Trek Into Darkness seems to have been made by a different team altogether.  All issue of spoilers aside, the way that Abrams has conducted himself in the press junket for the sequel is dismissive at best, and outright offensive at worst.  And he doesn’t seem to care.  His philosophy seems to be “fuck you, got mine,” at every turn.  From the initial secrecy marketing (not to mention the deep fuckery it conceals) to the stupid-ass insulting bullshit like this that he spouts in interviews, it is transparently obvious that Abrams a) does not know a thing about Star Trek, b) does not care to, and c) does not give a shit about the people who do.

This feels like a betrayal to those of us who watched the first movie and loved it.  To find out that it was apparently so apt and so loving by accident is, in a lot of ways, worse than if the 2009 movie had been shitty to begin with.  If it had been shitty, oh well, it was a long shot anyway.  But for it to be good, and then to spend four years building hopes and expectations that we could have that again, only to piss in the fans’ face… that hurts, man.

It’s not about what makes a good reboot, or the fact that bad new stories don’t erase old good ones, because you’re right.  They don’t.  However, bad new stories made deliberately in the image of good old ones with no respect nor consideration of the source material might as well not even bother with the source at all. And if you go into an interview to promote your project and openly and insultingly admit to not liking the thing that it’s based on, then I have to conclude that you are a fucking sack of horse shit hack dickface motherfucker who is everything wrong with Hollywood.

(Source: catbushandludicrous)

ohmygil:

fleurdeliser:

cheia:


Safe abortions have always been available to the rich, Dan. You simply want to deny them to the poor, and if you succeed, poor woman will be forced to get them anyway. They’ll be forced into the alleys with hangers, plungers and vacuum cleaners, risking death or mutilation. But you’d like that, wouldn’t you, Dan? You sadistic, elitist, sexist, racist, anti-humanist pig!

Saturday Night Live 3x18

This aired in 1978. Thirty-five years later, it’s still a fucking ~debate.

the sad part is people don’t really remember this debate, they just remember the response that follows:
“Jane you ignorant slut!”

ohmygil:

fleurdeliser:

cheia:

Safe abortions have always been available to the rich, Dan. You simply want to deny them to the poor, and if you succeed, poor woman will be forced to get them anyway. They’ll be forced into the alleys with hangers, plungers and vacuum cleaners, risking death or mutilation. But you’d like that, wouldn’t you, Dan? You sadistic, elitist, sexist, racist, anti-humanist pig!

Saturday Night Live 3x18

This aired in 1978. Thirty-five years later, it’s still a fucking ~debate.

the sad part is people don’t really remember this debate, they just remember the response that follows:

“Jane you ignorant slut!”

(via persideraiuro)

22,026 notes

upperstories:

firelordazula:

“Every Every Every Generation Has Been The Me Me Me Generation” by Elspeth Reeve for The Atlantic Wire

Millennials are the “ME ME ME GENERATION,” writes Joel Stein for Time magazine’s new cover story out today — which makes him only the latest culture writer in the last century or so to declare the youth self-obsessed little monsters.


#get off my lawn: a retrospective
(via rubitintomyeyes)

upperstories:

firelordazula:

Every Every Every Generation Has Been The Me Me Me Generation” by Elspeth Reeve for The Atlantic Wire

Millennials are the “ME ME ME GENERATION,” writes Joel Stein for Time magazine’s new cover story out today — which makes him only the latest culture writer in the last century or so to declare the youth self-obsessed little monsters.

(via rubitintomyeyes)

(via hellscabanaboy)

2,300 notes

thirdmagic:

I think my favorite thing about Fate is that it’s essentially about a bunch of self-destructive, beyond dysfunctional and fucked up people devoting their entire lives and existences to and completely screwing themselves over for abstract, impossibly extreme ideals they don’t understand and for achieving goals they don’t even truly want nor actually expect to succeed in getting for various complex and often very existentialist reasons.

And that’s just perfect. 

77 notes

dumber than advertised: i'm going to try to keep this simple.

airspaniel:

gmbeowulf:

dontbearuiner:

defcock:

I really like Benedict Cumberbatch as an actor, and as a person. he’s done some uncool shit, to be sure, and I don’t excuse it, but he’s a mostly good dude, I think. 

the thing is, it doesn’t matter what my opinion of BC is as an actor, or as a person, when it comes to discussion of Star Trek’s racefail and whitewashing of a canonically Indian character.

they are entirely separate issues. 

people being upset about Star Trek’s racefail has nothing to do with BC as an actor or as a person. you don’t have to defend him.

it’s really that simple. it’s not actually about BC qua BC. if any other white actor had been cast as Khan, we’d complain just as loud and just as hard, because it would hurt people just as much. the damage is done no matter what face they put on it.

what if they’d hired Tom Hiddleston? still wrong, still whitewashing. 

what if they’d hired Richard Armitage? still wrong, still whitewashing. 

what if they’d hired Brad Pitt? Matt Damon? Daniel Day-Lewis, arguably the greatest actor of our time? still wrong, still whitewashing. 

WHAT IF IT WAS AN ALTERNATE REALITY AND CHRIS PINE WAS CAST AS KHAN?? 

STILL WRONG. 

it’s not about the actor. it’s not about the actor. it’s not about the actor.

it’s about what the actor represents, which is the fact that at some point, the creators of this film decided that there was no brown person good enough to play a character which is a brown person. and that’s fucking bullshit. that’s insulting to every non-white actor working on the planet, and it’s insulting to every non-white person in the potential audience. 

that’s it. that’s all it’s about. 

it’s not about the actor, and good GOD almighty, it’s not about you. 

it’s not about your feelings as a fan of Cumberbatch. it just isn’t. this conversation, which is, let me clarify, about the racefail and whitewashing in Star Trek, is not going to hurt you in any way. you don’t have to defend yourself. let it go. 

and lastly, if you listen to me, your white compatriot who also loves BC, when you wouldn’t listen to all the POC who have every right in this world to complain about this problem? that’s fucking racist, and go fuck yourself. that one’s about you. 

…so, not to belittle your point, as I was kinda hoping Cumberbach was playing a much-more-fitting Gary Mitchell myself, Star Trek has never been particularly good about racially-appropriate casting. Or did anyone think Ricardo Gonzalo Pedro Montalbán y Merino was Indian?

Gary Mitchell would’ve made a TON more sense, and I was actually really looking forward to seeing how a reimagining of that story would go. But no such luck, I guess.

And aside from Khan, I don’t really know what you mean by saying that Star Trek has “never been particularly good about racially-appropriate casting.”  Khan is literally the only character I can think of who even remotely fits this parameter.  What Star Trek was, at least in the original series, was ethnically diverse in its casting, even against all societal mores.  There were people of color in a wide variety of roles, leads even; scientists and technicians and rulers of planets, and yes, ensigns and yeomen.  Fuck’s sake, they did an entire EPISODE about how stupid it is to judge someone based on their skin color.  Frank Gorshin won awards for it.  And yeah, maybe IDIC was put into the show as a merchandising grab by Roddenberry, but it has also been a core concept of the show from its inception.

And yes, maybe Montalban is no more Indian than Cumberbatch, and it is problematic to assume that all brown people are interchangeable.  However, Montalban was a well-known actor at the time of the show, while South Asian actors were not as prevalent in Hollywood.  But you know what there’s a whole lot of right now?  Really excellent South Asian actors who have a lot of American film and television experience.  Abrams has worked with some of them.  And they were really good.  So there’s no excuse for whitewashing the role. 

Because you know who never has trouble finding good roles written for them?  White dudes.  You know who never has trouble ACQUIRING those roles?  Talented white dudes like the Batch.  You know who we don’t need to take chromatic roles and bleach them out for?  Fucking ANYBODY.  Because it’s already sad enough that so many amazing and talented actors are still slighted in 2013, just because of the color of their skin, and there’s no reason to take any of the few roles that were written for them away.  I don’t care WHAT white actor they’re given to.  The practice itself is racist and insulting.

genderbitch:

cynicaldouche:

elainemorisi:

aiffe:

chainofaffection:

“Have you ever come across a homeless individual and felt totally uncomfortable?

You see them and you know they are in need, but you are not sure what to do. You know that handing them money is not the best thing. But, you also see that they clearly have some needs. Their lips are chapped. They are hungry. They are thirsty. They are asking for help.

How can you help?

[snipped for long and pointless]

Hey, words from an actual former homeless person here.
Those people you see who make you uncomfortable? Those aren’t homeless people, they’re beggars. Well, some of them are also homeless. Some of them are not. NOT ALL HOMELESS PEOPLE ARE BEGGARS. (Also, they’re not all addicts, though some are. You literally know nothing about a beggar’s life except that they are beggars.)
Beggars have a uniform like any other kind of worker. They have to look as bedraggled and dirty and pathetic as possible. If you gave a beggar a chance to shower and wash their clothes, you would be damaging their earning potential. They make their money by manipulating the feelings of people who don’t know much about poverty. That means they have to play to stereotypes, some of which are like a hundred years out of date.
When I was homeless, I did not beg. (I stole, dealt with charities, sometimes even worked. Yes, you can be homeless with a full-time job. I’ve worked 60 hours a week and been homeless. And I mean sleeping in a car or a tent homeless, not on somebody’s couch homeless, though that’s an under-counted form of homelessness. I asked for food once or twice, but I didn’t look like a beggar.) I kept myself clean. I looked like anyone else. That person you pass in the store, on the bus, someone who looks just like anyone else, they could be homeless. The sales clerk who helps you for minimum wage. They could have lost their apartment because you can’t pay rent on that salary.
I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with begging. And it’s true that some people do actually just look like that because due to mental illness or addiction they sincerely can’t take care of themselves. Some of them are honestly nothing more than scam artists who have no real need, though, playing off people’s sympathy for those who genuinely do need help. But let’s assume that you were giving these to an actual homeless person.
- soap is not that difficult to come by if you are so inclined to have/use it. Many public bathrooms have it. Homeless shelters will give you a bar of it. If you have $10 or so for a truck stop shower, soap is provided. Running water is a lot more difficult.
- believe it or not, they may already have a toothbrush and toothpaste, and if they don’t, it’s unlikely they have any interest in using them. Homeless people commonly cache useful items wrapped in plastic in a bunch of hidden places. If you want to help the homeless, next time you find one of those caches, don’t throw them away. I mean, think about it. If you had to start living on the street, would you stop brushing your teeth? I didn’t either. Plus, if everyone gave homeless people one of these packs, they’d have more toothbrushes than they did teeth. Same with the deodorant—one stick lasts a long time, and they give them to you in shelters. This kind of mismanagement and waste is incredibly frustrating. People are willing to flush money down the toilet to avoid helping you TOO much.
- food is nice! But keep in mind that not everyone can eat stuff you give them. Dietary restrictions like diabetes and Crohn’s unfortunately don’t go away when you become homeless. Maybe this is why they were hoping for cash? Also, some (though not all) homeless people have access to food already through food stamps, soup kitchens, charities, etc. A granola bar is nice, but they likely have other problems. If they need food, they will usually have a sign asking for food, or ask for it verbally! Otherwise food might not be a problem for them.
- I’ve given medicine to beggars when it was asked for. Medicine can be super useful if you have a need of it. But when you don’t have a place to put your shit, you realize what a luxury it is to be able to store shit you don’t need at the moment. At best, it could go into one of those caches, if that individual uses caches, or into a shopping cart if they haul one of those around. Or in a car if they have one.
You know what’s useful, lightweight, and portable? MONEY.
You know what money can be used for?
- the nightly fee of some pay-shelters to keep you out of the elements.
- minutes for a pay-as-you-go phone, which can be used for emergencies, scheduling appointments with therapists, doctors, and addiction counselors, even searching for jobs or housing. There is a TON of bureaucracy involved in getting help when you have nothing, and that shit burns through your minutes. Payphones? What is this, 1980? I still have and use a phone I bought while living in my car. It was $10.
- gas for a car, if they have one. (Commoner in rural areas.)
- a hot shower at a truck stop.
- medicine, including prescription medication.
- items that protect against the elements, in their size!
- transportation. News flash, no bus will let you on for pocket change.
- items you might not even think of, like pet food (some homeless people have pets!) sanitary napkins (even if they don’t look female—remember how the homeless rates go up if you’re queer? Yeah.) condoms (possibly for sex work? Not something you want to assume though!) diapers (adult or otherwise! seriously! You don’t know their lives!) or pretty much anything else THAT IS BOUGHT AND SOLD WITH MONEY.
Does that include cigarettes, drugs, and alcohol? You bet it does. But you know what, if that’s what they need, you’re in no position to judge. I’ve never been through withdrawal, but I’ve seen people go through it, and it’s complete shit. If that were you, yeah, you wouldn’t want to get drug sick, are you fucking kidding me? Offset it with a contribution to a rehab center, whatever helps you sleep at night.
And all this is assuming the person giving you a case of the guilts is actually homeless. When they may not be. And other people you don’t notice around you almost surely are.
That uncomfortable feeling you get, though? That has a name. It’s called INEQUALITY. It means that you know you have shit other people don’t have access to. You probably have resources so that even if you were in trouble, there’d be safety nets. You have the kind of money that you can buy a bunch of care packages to assuage this horrible guilt you feel every time you’re in bed in the rain and you know someone else out there isn’t. Those feelings are right. The world shouldn’t be this unequal. We shouldn’t have houses standing empty while people live on the street. We shouldn’t have food sitting in warehouses till it spoils while people starve. We shouldn’t be punishing people for trying to medicate away the pain we gave them.
If you want to REALLY help the poor, go buy a pen and paper and write to your representatives. Stop blaming “generational welfare users” for being “leeches on the system.” Tell them you want to see real aid going to people in your community. Tell them to fund the mental health system, which is inadequate for the demand and constantly getting slashed. Tell them you don’t want to see food stamps cut for bad grades! Tell them a stitch in time saves nine, and if they helped people who were losing their homes, maybe there wouldn’t be so many homeless. Tell them to decriminalize drug use and prostitution. Tell them to support programs like Insite. Support universal healthcare, because you’d be surprised how many people end up homeless due to illness, either in themselves or a family member. If you’re ever in a position of power, such as a landlord or employer, don’t discriminate against people who don’t have a current address. Also don’t discriminate against marginalized groups by race, gender, orientation, ability, etc. These people are more likely to end up homeless because of this BS. Check out charities in your area doing actual outreach with the poor, many of whom are not beggars and not visible. And if you’re going to give a beggar something, either ask them what they need or just give them fucking money.
You can’t make that uncomfortable feeling go away with the wave of a magic wand. You can’t buy exemption from the fact that you HAVE and others DON’T with some soap and granola.

And if you’re going to give a beggar something, either ask them what they need or just give them fucking money.

AllOfThis

Finally someone tore that shit post apart.
I was too inarticulate with rage as a someone who’s been homeless to hit it.

genderbitch:

cynicaldouche:

elainemorisi:

aiffe:

chainofaffection:

“Have you ever come across a homeless individual and felt totally uncomfortable?
You see them and you know they are in need, but you are not sure what to do. You know that handing them money is not the best thing. But, you also see that they clearly have some needs. Their lips are chapped. They are hungry. They are thirsty. They are asking for help.
How can you help?
[snipped for long and pointless]

Hey, words from an actual former homeless person here.

Those people you see who make you uncomfortable? Those aren’t homeless people, they’re beggars. Well, some of them are also homeless. Some of them are not. NOT ALL HOMELESS PEOPLE ARE BEGGARS. (Also, they’re not all addicts, though some are. You literally know nothing about a beggar’s life except that they are beggars.)

Beggars have a uniform like any other kind of worker. They have to look as bedraggled and dirty and pathetic as possible. If you gave a beggar a chance to shower and wash their clothes, you would be damaging their earning potential. They make their money by manipulating the feelings of people who don’t know much about poverty. That means they have to play to stereotypes, some of which are like a hundred years out of date.

When I was homeless, I did not beg. (I stole, dealt with charities, sometimes even worked. Yes, you can be homeless with a full-time job. I’ve worked 60 hours a week and been homeless. And I mean sleeping in a car or a tent homeless, not on somebody’s couch homeless, though that’s an under-counted form of homelessness. I asked for food once or twice, but I didn’t look like a beggar.) I kept myself clean. I looked like anyone else. That person you pass in the store, on the bus, someone who looks just like anyone else, they could be homeless. The sales clerk who helps you for minimum wage. They could have lost their apartment because you can’t pay rent on that salary.

I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with begging. And it’s true that some people do actually just look like that because due to mental illness or addiction they sincerely can’t take care of themselves. Some of them are honestly nothing more than scam artists who have no real need, though, playing off people’s sympathy for those who genuinely do need help. But let’s assume that you were giving these to an actual homeless person.

- soap is not that difficult to come by if you are so inclined to have/use it. Many public bathrooms have it. Homeless shelters will give you a bar of it. If you have $10 or so for a truck stop shower, soap is provided. Running water is a lot more difficult.

- believe it or not, they may already have a toothbrush and toothpaste, and if they don’t, it’s unlikely they have any interest in using them. Homeless people commonly cache useful items wrapped in plastic in a bunch of hidden places. If you want to help the homeless, next time you find one of those caches, don’t throw them away. I mean, think about it. If you had to start living on the street, would you stop brushing your teeth? I didn’t either. Plus, if everyone gave homeless people one of these packs, they’d have more toothbrushes than they did teeth. Same with the deodorant—one stick lasts a long time, and they give them to you in shelters. This kind of mismanagement and waste is incredibly frustrating. People are willing to flush money down the toilet to avoid helping you TOO much.

- food is nice! But keep in mind that not everyone can eat stuff you give them. Dietary restrictions like diabetes and Crohn’s unfortunately don’t go away when you become homeless. Maybe this is why they were hoping for cash? Also, some (though not all) homeless people have access to food already through food stamps, soup kitchens, charities, etc. A granola bar is nice, but they likely have other problems. If they need food, they will usually have a sign asking for food, or ask for it verbally! Otherwise food might not be a problem for them.

- I’ve given medicine to beggars when it was asked for. Medicine can be super useful if you have a need of it. But when you don’t have a place to put your shit, you realize what a luxury it is to be able to store shit you don’t need at the moment. At best, it could go into one of those caches, if that individual uses caches, or into a shopping cart if they haul one of those around. Or in a car if they have one.

You know what’s useful, lightweight, and portable? MONEY.

You know what money can be used for?

- the nightly fee of some pay-shelters to keep you out of the elements.

- minutes for a pay-as-you-go phone, which can be used for emergencies, scheduling appointments with therapists, doctors, and addiction counselors, even searching for jobs or housing. There is a TON of bureaucracy involved in getting help when you have nothing, and that shit burns through your minutes. Payphones? What is this, 1980? I still have and use a phone I bought while living in my car. It was $10.

- gas for a car, if they have one. (Commoner in rural areas.)

- a hot shower at a truck stop.

- medicine, including prescription medication.

- items that protect against the elements, in their size!

- transportation. News flash, no bus will let you on for pocket change.

- items you might not even think of, like pet food (some homeless people have pets!) sanitary napkins (even if they don’t look female—remember how the homeless rates go up if you’re queer? Yeah.) condoms (possibly for sex work? Not something you want to assume though!) diapers (adult or otherwise! seriously! You don’t know their lives!) or pretty much anything else THAT IS BOUGHT AND SOLD WITH MONEY.

Does that include cigarettes, drugs, and alcohol? You bet it does. But you know what, if that’s what they need, you’re in no position to judge. I’ve never been through withdrawal, but I’ve seen people go through it, and it’s complete shit. If that were you, yeah, you wouldn’t want to get drug sick, are you fucking kidding me? Offset it with a contribution to a rehab center, whatever helps you sleep at night.

And all this is assuming the person giving you a case of the guilts is actually homeless. When they may not be. And other people you don’t notice around you almost surely are.

That uncomfortable feeling you get, though? That has a name. It’s called INEQUALITY. It means that you know you have shit other people don’t have access to. You probably have resources so that even if you were in trouble, there’d be safety nets. You have the kind of money that you can buy a bunch of care packages to assuage this horrible guilt you feel every time you’re in bed in the rain and you know someone else out there isn’t. Those feelings are right. The world shouldn’t be this unequal. We shouldn’t have houses standing empty while people live on the street. We shouldn’t have food sitting in warehouses till it spoils while people starve. We shouldn’t be punishing people for trying to medicate away the pain we gave them.

If you want to REALLY help the poor, go buy a pen and paper and write to your representatives. Stop blaming “generational welfare users” for being “leeches on the system.” Tell them you want to see real aid going to people in your community. Tell them to fund the mental health system, which is inadequate for the demand and constantly getting slashed. Tell them you don’t want to see food stamps cut for bad grades! Tell them a stitch in time saves nine, and if they helped people who were losing their homes, maybe there wouldn’t be so many homeless. Tell them to decriminalize drug use and prostitution. Tell them to support programs like Insite. Support universal healthcare, because you’d be surprised how many people end up homeless due to illness, either in themselves or a family member. If you’re ever in a position of power, such as a landlord or employer, don’t discriminate against people who don’t have a current address. Also don’t discriminate against marginalized groups by race, gender, orientation, ability, etc. These people are more likely to end up homeless because of this BS. Check out charities in your area doing actual outreach with the poor, many of whom are not beggars and not visible. And if you’re going to give a beggar something, either ask them what they need or just give them fucking money.

You can’t make that uncomfortable feeling go away with the wave of a magic wand. You can’t buy exemption from the fact that you HAVE and others DON’T with some soap and granola.

And if you’re going to give a beggar something, either ask them what they need or just give them fucking money.

All
Of
This

Finally someone tore that shit post apart.

I was too inarticulate with rage as a someone who’s been homeless to hit it.

(Source: yourpersonalcheerleader, via youkais)

milk tea: Children's Shows Don't Belong to You

jmandrake:

We’ve all seen the theories, repeated and twisted ad nauseum to fit nearly every children’s show. Angelica dreamed up the other Rugrats. Even the humans at Foster’s Home for Imaginary Friends were imaginary. The events that took place in Codename: Kids Next Door were just kids…

11,169 notes

champagnesafari:

drowninginjohnlockfeels:

SOMEONE SAID IT.

womp womp

champagnesafari:

drowninginjohnlockfeels:

SOMEONE SAID IT.

womp womp

(Source: so-elegantly-disheveled, via ourafrica)

129,871 notes

androphilia:

“Being a woman is not a means to humiliate and punish anyone”
After a policeman in the Iranian Kurdish town of Marivan paraded an accused criminal in traditional Kurdish women’s clothes in the streets in order to humiliate him, women marched in the city condemning the use of women’s attire as a kind of humiliation.
In support, an internet campaign of Kurdish and other Iranian men has sprung up showing men wearing Kurdish women’s clothes and messages and support. For example, this message says,”wearing Kurdish women’s clothes is not only not an insult, it is instead a great honor for us,” and goes on to describe how women stand side by side with men in every part of society and during wartime.
Support the campaign by liking the page! زن بودن ابزار تحقیر و تنبیه هیچ کس نیست
(via Ajam Media Collective)

androphilia:

“Being a woman is not a means to humiliate and punish anyone”

After a policeman in the Iranian Kurdish town of Marivan paraded an accused criminal in traditional Kurdish women’s clothes in the streets in order to humiliate him, women marched in the city condemning the use of women’s attire as a kind of humiliation.

In support, an internet campaign of Kurdish and other Iranian men has sprung up showing men wearing Kurdish women’s clothes and messages and support. For example, this message says,”wearing Kurdish women’s clothes is not only not an insult, it is instead a great honor for us,” and goes on to describe how women stand side by side with men in every part of society and during wartime.

Support the campaign by liking the page!
زن بودن ابزار تحقیر و تنبیه هیچ کس نیست

(via Ajam Media Collective)

(via minuiko)

28,203 notes

This is what people see as they commute to work in Philly. 

Hollaback Philly is absolutely doing it right

(Source: poweredbygirl, via nevernevergirl)